3d Retreat :: Home :: Pre/Reviews   
the network :: 
Rainbow Six Retreat 
File Retreat 
Ghost Recon Retreat 
Airsoft Retreat 
Splinter Cell Retreat 
Hazzard Retreat 
3dR functions :: 
3dR Chatroom
Login 
3dR NewsSearch Search 
sponsors :: 



 

 

 
Home Games Pre/Reviews Forums Search Contact
 :: Cenatek Rocket Drive
 

Performance Results
No surprises here, the Rocket Drive's performance was incredible. It was essentially off the scale on the testing software. I did not happen to get the same results as Cenatek, but if you do any kind of graphic design, video editing. I would highly suggest you run out and get one of these cards. I generated a round gradient of 10000x10000 pixels in photoshop, and these are the results with only giving photoshop 133meg of system memory

Photoshop w/ ATA 133 7200 RPM Swap
Generate Image in memory 101 seconds
Show Image on screen 11 seconds
Total 112 seconds
Photoshop w/ Rocket Drive Swap
Generate Image in Memory 39 Seconds
Show Image on Screen 2 seconds
Total 41 Seconds

As you can see the total Time is much faster with the rocket drive. Since the image was about 230 meg, and Photoshop used about 1/2 the memory in the system, the larger images you work with the better performance via the Rocket Drive.

I did a couple tests using SiSoft Hard Drive Benchmark and HD Tach. The numbers speak for themselves. Notice that overhead CPU usage on the Rocket Drive is about 1% less than the Hard Drive. Also you will notice that seek time is <.1ms (dang fast). Another advantage of the Rocket Drive, is that no matter where the data is stored, it takes the same around of time to access, compared to the hard drive that gets slower the further out on the platter.


The SiSoft Benchmark pretty much shows that the Rocket Drive Smokes a U160 SCSI 15K RPM drive

Another great feature of the Rocket Drive, is being able to install a game onto it. My system is by no means a monster. Just a dual 800. It's served me well, but loading games can take some time, even with an ATA 100 7200RPM drive. So I tested it out on battlefield 1942. I loaded the 'Battle of the Bulge' map in single player, loading off the hard drive took about 46 seconds. I then installed the game to the Rocket Drive. I was amazed at the load time.. 26 seconds!. I did not do any testing in multi player games, as I could not get any firm results due to replicating network usage, but from experience playing, it allows me to join games as one of the first four or five people into a server.

Also with DirectX games, you might get a little bit of a performance increase by putting the OS swap file on the Rocket Drive. Since DirectX tends to need virtual memory for one reason or another, it should help loading sounds etc.

Over all this can improve your gaming, give you a leg up by getting to spawn points more quickly, and getting the vehicles you want. This card is more taylor made for graphics/video/database work, but it sure can improve your gaming also. For anyone who does some kind of graphics or video work, and games. this card is for you.

Conclusion
Home



 
Home Games Pre/Reviews Forums Search Contact
All content copyright (c) 1999-2000 3d Retreat Site optimized for 800x600 / IE 4.0+

Privacy Policy